SOCI 1010 Touchstone 1: Developing a Research Plan Sophia Learning

Stuck with a difficult assignment? No time to get your paper done? Feeling confused? If you’re looking for reliable and timely help for assignments, you’ve come to the right place. We promise 100% original, plagiarism-free papers custom-written for you. Yes, we write every assignment from scratch and it’s solely custom-made for you.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass your Milestone before you submit it. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.

This Touchstone provides an opportunity for you to practice developing a research plan for a real world topic that interests you. Throughout this course you will read about the results and conclusions of many different sociological studies; this Touchstone is where you can practice the skills of conducting such a study. You will use the materials you develop for this Touchstone for a later Touchstone.

This Touchstone will further strengthen your problem solving skill, while reinforcing the content from the lesson. You will analyze your research topic of choice, while applying the problem solving skills from the unit. By considering the dynamics of community groups, you will also strengthen your relationship building and self and social awareness skills.

Touchstone 1: Developing a Research Plan

SCENARIO: Imagine that you work for a nonprofit organization that is focused on increasing diversity in community groups in your area. Your supervisor asks you to develop a sociological study concerning topics of diversity and collaboration in a specific community group of your choice. Eventually you will prepare to share your research with colleagues.

ASSIGNMENT: For this Touchstone, you will begin by formulating a question about diversity in a community group that you have access to. Then you will use the steps of the scientific method to prepare a research plan, including a bibliography for a literature review. As you learned, sociologists follow the scientific method so that their results are both scientifically valid and useful to the greater sociological community. A literature review allows researchers to learn from completed studies and to build upon their conclusions.

Use the following Touchstone template to fill in your research plan as you develop it. When you have finished, submit this template to move on to the next unit.

Touchstone 1 Template

Touchstone 1 Sample

A. Directions

Step 1: Pick a Topic

Select a community group to study. Some examples of community groups you might explore include:

  • An activity-based group like a book club, a soccer team, or a community choir
  • A religious or ideological community such as a church congregation or a local political party
  • A community organization like a Parent Teacher Association (PTA), a neighborhood association, or the volunteer committee at a local soup kitchen
  • An identity-based organization such as a social club for veterans or a fraternal type organization

It should be a group in which membership is voluntary and recreational. Avoid:

  • Families
  • Workplaces
  • Ethnic or racial categories
  • Friend groups

You might wish to choose a group that you are a part of, or you might not. You can use your personal experience with the group to form the basis of your research question. Or you can ask members of the group about their experiences, which will help you develop your research question.

In the template, write a paragraph (approximately 6-8 sentences) describing the community group you have chosen. In particular, be sure to answer the following questions:

  • What is the community group?
  • What are the attributes or characteristics of this community group? (e.g. What activities does this group do together? What element of the members’ interests or identities brings them together? How is membership in the group defined, if at all?)
  • What kind of experience with or access to this community group do you have?

Step 2: Ask a Question

Next, you will formulate a question related to this group, and to topics related to diversity and/or collaboration. You might think about diversity in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, socioeconomic status, or along multiple intersecting identities. Be sure to use what you learned in Unit 1 about the ways sociologists ask questions.

Examples:

  • What are the challenges of a mom’s community organization in appealing to moms with children of different ages?
  • How does a group of car enthusiasts reach out to the surrounding community to get support for their events?
  • How has the Boy Scouts accepting girls impacted their mission and programs?
  • Do gender segregated sports teams for kids help maintain traditional gender roles?

In the template, write the question you have formulated for your study. Be sure to identify the Independent and Dependent variables and identify them correctly. (HINT: Refer back to Lesson 1.3.3: Asking Questions and Lesson 1.3.5: Formulating a Hypothesis for help.)

Step 3: Prepare a Bibliography

Finally, you will begin developing a bibliography for a review of the existing literature that relates to your question. Before conducting a full literature review, a sociologist will build a bibliography, or a list of potential sources that they will read and study in greater depth in the review.

Collect 4-6 articles, books, or other resources that relate to your question and list them in your template. You don’t have to look into these materials in depth right now! You’ll review this literature more closely in a later Touchstone, and you will also be exposed to additional relevant research and frameworks in Unit 3. You’ll also be able to add to or amend your bibliography before your Touchstone in Unit 3.

Attributes of good readings for your literature review:

  • They are academic, scholarly works about research findings or they are reliable journalistic reporting based on scientifically credible and reliable data.
  • They should have been published in the last 20 years—unless they are a landmark work on the topic and provide important background or as a comparison.
  • They look at different sides of the argument and a variety of perspectives.
  • They do not have to be written by sociologists or published in sociology journals, but they should be academic and not popular works.

Where to find readings: More than likely you will use a major search engine like Google Scholar. Start your search by identifying key search terms related to your research question, to generate relevant results. Google Scholar specifically searches scholarly literature. However, keep in mind that much of this literature may have limited or paid access. Another good place to search is in a public library or university library catalog or database. You might also want to try regular Google, but you will have to be careful to screen your results and make sure you only select academic sources. Whichever way you choose to search, make sure that you are selecting credible sources.

What makes a source credible? Credible sources are written by authors who are well known in their field. They are based on scientific data—not opinions or with biased observations. Sources should be from reliable outlets, like major publishers, universities, think tanks, and credentialed current practitioners. (HINT: Refer back to Lesson 1.3.4: Researching Existing Sources for more guidance.)

How to format sources in your bibliography: Sociologists use American Psychological Association (APA) format for their research. However, you will use a more simplified method to format sources for your bibliography. You will include five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:

  • Author’s name(s)
  • Publisher and publication date
  • Title of the source, in quotation marks
  • Page numbers (if applicable)
  • Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)

 

EXAMPLE

Alireza Behtoui. Journal of Sociology, 2015. “Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people.” p. 711-724. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1440783315581217

Name:
Date:

 

SCENARIO: Imagine that you work for a nonprofit organization that is focused on increasing diversity in community groups in your area. Your supervisor asks you to develop a sociological study concerning topics of diversity and collaboration in a specific community group of your choice. Eventually you will prepare to share your research with colleagues.

 

ASSIGNMENT: For this Touchstone, you will begin by formulating a question about diversity in a community group that you have access to. Then you will use the steps of the scientific method to prepare a research plan, including a bibliography for a literature review. As you learned, sociologists follow the scientific method so that their results are both scientifically valid and useful to the greater sociological community. A literature review allows researchers to learn from completed studies and to build upon their conclusions.

 

SOCI1010 Unit 1 Touchstone Template

 

Complete the following template, including all parts, using complete sentences.

 

STEP 1: Pick a Topic

 

Write a paragraph (approximately 6-8 sentences) describing the community group you have chosen. Remember, it should be a group in which membership is voluntary and recreational.

 

In particular, be sure to answer the following questions:

 

●       What is the community group?

●       What are the attributes or characteristics of this community group? (e.g. What activities does this group do together? What element of the members’ interests or identities brings them together? How is membership in the group defined, if at all?)

●       What kind of experience with or access to this community group do you have?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STEP 2: Ask a Question

 

Formulate a research question related to this group, and to topics related to diversity and/or collaboration. Write the question you have formulated for your study, and identify the independent and dependent variables.

 

Remember, an independent variable is a variable that causes or drives a change in outcome. A dependent variable is an effect, or a variable that is influenced by an independent variable.

 

Research question:

 

Independent variable:

 

Dependent variable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

STEP 3: Prepare a Bibliography

 

List 4-6 articles, books, or other resources that relate to your question for your literature review.

 

Remember, attributes of good readings for your literature review include:

●      They are academic, scholarly works about research findings or they are reliable journalistic reporting based on scientifically credible and reliable data.

●      They should have been published in the last 20 years—unless they are a landmark work on the topic and provide important background or as a comparison.

●      They look at different sides of the argument and a variety of perspectives.

●      They do not have to be written by sociologists or published in sociology journals, but they should be academic and not popular works.

Use the simplified method to format sources for your bibliography. Include five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:

 

●       Author’s name(s)

●       Publisher and Publication date

●       Title of the source, inside quotation marks

●       Page numbers (if applicable)

●       Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)

Example:

 

  1. Alireza Behtoui. Journal of Sociology, 2015. “Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people.” p. 711-724. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1440783315581217

Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass your Milestone before you submit it. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.

This Touchstone provides an opportunity for you to build on the work you developed in Unit 1 by conducting your literature review and developing a hypothesis and proposed research plan. By articulating your research plan, you will be educating others on the problem solving process you have applied to your topic. You will also strengthen your relationship building and self and social awareness skills by providing a thorough explanation of a sociological concept.

Touchstone 3: Presenting a Research Plan

SCENARIO: Your supervisor has approved your research question and plan for studying some aspect of diversity and/or collaboration in a community group. Now it is time to conduct your literature review and develop your hypothesis and research plan.

ASSIGNMENT: In the first Touchstone, you developed a research question and prepared a preliminary bibliography for your literature review. You will now conduct your literature review, formulate your hypothesis and research plan, and develop a set of notecards that summarize your work.

REQUIREMENTS: You must create 8-11 notecards using the touchstone template below. Your notecards will include:

  • introduction card
  • research question card
  • literature review (4–6 cards)
  • hypothesis card
  • operational definitions card (if needed)
  • research method card

Touchstone 3 Template
Touchstone 3 Sample

When you have finished, submit the Touchstone template. Before you get started, let’s look at how you’ll build your notecards, step by step.

A. Directions

Step 1: Revise Touchstone 1

First, return to the community group description, research question, and proposed bibliography that you submitted in Touchstone 1, and make any necessary changes based on feedback from the grader. You will likely want to refine your reading list based on the feedback you received and what you learned about diversity and collaboration in Unit 3.

Step 2: Conduct a Literature Review

Next, complete your reading for your literature review.

Reminder of attributes of good readings for your literature review:

  • They are academic, scholarly works about research findings or they are reliable journalistic reporting based on scientifically credible and reliable data.
  • They should have been published in the last 20 years—unless they are a landmark work on the topic and provide important background or as a comparison.
  • They look at different sides of the argument and a variety of perspectives.

As you complete each reading, take notes. Some of the questions you could ask about each reading include:

  1. Who wrote this article? Is it the researchers themselves, or is it a journalist writing about their findings?
  2. Where was it published? Is it a scholarly publication like an academic journal, or is it for a popular audience? If the publication is for a popular audience, how would you characterize the audience?
  3. Do they have an academic affiliation? Are the researchers sociologists, or are they of a different discipline?
  4. When was the research conducted?
  5. What question were the researchers attempting to answer?
  6. How does this question/topic relate to my question/topic?
  7. What methods did they use to study their question?
  8. What conclusions did they draw from their results?
  9. How do their conclusions impact my research question, hypothesis, or research plan?

As you did for your first Touchstone, you will include five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:

  • Author’s name(s)
  • Publisher and publication date
  • Title of the source, in quotation marks
  • Page numbers (if applicable)
  • Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)

 

EXAMPLE

Alireza Behtoui. Journal of Sociology, 2015. “Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people.” p. 711-724. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1440783315581217

 

Step 3: Formulate a Hypothesis, State Your Operational Definitions, and Choose a Research Method

Hypothesis
Next, formulate a hypothesis for your research question and choose a sociological research method appropriate for testing your hypothesis. While you won’t be conducting the research, you will write up a description of how you plan to conduct your research. (HINT: Refer back to Lesson 1.3.5: Formulating a HypothesisLesson 1.3.6: Collecting Data: Quantitative Approaches , and Lesson 1.3.6: Collecting Data: Quantitative Approaches for help.)

A formal hypothesis states the relationship between two variables—one is independent (IV) and one is dependent (DV). It must also be formatted as an If/Then statement, for instance:

  • If people eat chocolate (IV), then they will get pimples (DV).
  • If people go to the gym (IV), then they will be fit (DV).

Operational Definitions
Operational definitions identify important concepts related to the research. For example, If your community organization includes students, are they K-12? College? Medical? Or are students defined as: young adults between the ages of 18-21 who are attending a particular college or university?

Research Method
Deciding on a research method will also take some thought and planning:

  1. Will you use qualitative or quantitative research or a combination?
  2. How will you engage subjects or find your data?
  3. What kinds of tools and assessments will be used to gather the data?

Step 4: Prepare Your Notecards

Finally, incorporate Steps 1-4 to prepare a set of notecards for your proposed research study. Use the template provided to create 8-11 notecards that present the work you completed in Steps 1-4.

 

Notecard Component
Introduction Your introduction notecard should introduce your audience to the community group being studied.
Research question Your second notecard will state your research question.
Literature Review (4-6 cards) Now that you’ve introduced your community group and research question, it’s time to add information to your literature review notecards. Each source should have one notecard. The notecard should describe the information and analysis you performed in Step 2.
Hypothesis Your hypothesis notecard should describe your hypothesis.
Operational definitions Your operational definitions notecard should include and explain any operational definitions you developed for your study. You may skip this card if you have none.
Research method Your research method notecard should introduce your proposed research method and explain how you propose to conduct your research.

 

 


 

B. Rubric

 

Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)

Literature Review: Sources and Feedback

Sources are of good quality and feedback was applied.
4-6 sources appropriate for a sociological literature review are provided; all feedback on the Unit 1 Touchstone bibliography was addressed. At least 3 sources appropriate for a sociological literature review are provided; most feedback on the Unit 1 Touchstone bibliography was addressed. At least 2 sources appropriate for a sociological literature review are provided; some feedback on the Unit 1 Touchstone bibliography was addressed. Only 1 source appropriate for a sociological literature review is provided; there is little evidence that feedback on the Unit 1 Touchstone bibliography was addressed. Did not identify any appropriate sources or submitted so little work that no credit can be given.

Literature Review: Description and Analysis

Sources are described and analyzed.
Sources are described thoroughly and accurately, and relevance to research topic is identified. Most of the sources are described thoroughly and accurately, and in most cases the relevance to research topic is identified. Most of the sources are described thoroughly and accurately. Relevance to research topic may be absent. Most of the sources are minimally described or contain inaccuracies in their descriptions. Relevance to research topic may be absent. Sources are not described or analyzed.

Hypothesis and Operational Definitions

A well-developed hypothesis is provided and operational definitions are identified.
Hypothesis is well-aligned to the research question, is testable, and predicts outcomes between two or more identified variables. All concepts needing operational definitions are identified and definitions are provided. Hypothesis achieves two of three: is well-aligned to the research question; is testable; predicts outcomes between two or more identified variables. Not all concepts needing operational definitions are identified or defined. Hypothesis achieves one of three: is well-aligned to the research question; is testable; predicts outcomes between two or more identified variables. Concepts needing operational definitions may be unidentified or undefined. Hypothesis is not well-aligned to the research question; Concepts needing operational definitions may be unidentified or undefined. Did not submit a hypothesis or submitted so little work that no credit can be given.

Research Method

A suitable research method is selected and described.
A qualitative or quantitative research method that is suitable to the research question is selected and explained. Specific instruments are identified. A qualitative or quantitative research method that is suitable to the research question is selected and explained. A qualitative or quantitative research method is identified and explained but is not suitable for the research question. A decision to use qualitative or quantitative methods is made but is not specified or explained. Did not submit an explanation of a proposed research method or submitted so little work that no credit can be given.

Writing Mechanics

Writing follows conventions for standard written English.
There are 0-2 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. There are 3-4 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. There are 5-6 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. There are 7-10 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. There are more than 10 errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.

 

C. Requirements

The following requirements must be met for your submission:

  • Use a readable 11- or 12-point font.
  • All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
  • Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
  • Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
  • Submission must include your name and the date.
  • Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
  • Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
Writerbay.net

We’ve proficient writers who can handle both short and long papers, be they academic or non-academic papers, on topics ranging from soup to nuts (both literally and as the saying goes, if you know what we mean). We know how much you care about your grades and academic success. That's why we ensure the highest quality for your assignment. We're ready to help you even in the most critical situation. We're the perfect solution for all your writing needs.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper