nursing-sensitive indicators

Rubric

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart A: Question 1
3.0 pts

Successfully identified the nursing-sensitive indicators.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with the identification of nursing-sensitive indicators.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with the identification of nursing-sensitive indicators.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart A: Question 2

Part I: Question 2

3.0 pts

Successfully discussed how nursing-sensitive indicator data can be utilized to enhance safety and quality of patient care.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with how the nursing-sensitive indicators can be utilized to enhance safety and quality of patient care.

1.0 pts

Discussed how nursing-sensitive indicator data can be utilized to enhance safety or quality of patient care (failed to discuss both).

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart A: Question 3

Part I: Question 3

3.0 pts

Successfully discussed the relationship between nursing staffing and 2 of the conditions listed.

2.0 pts

Successfully discussed the relationship between nursing staffing and 1 of the conditions listed.

1.0 pts

Successfully discussed 2 of the conditions listed but fails to address the relationship to nurse staffing.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart B: Question 1
3.0 pts

Correctly calculated the number of productive FTEs that would be needed and showed calculations.

2.0 pts

Correctly calculated the number of productive FTEs that would be needed but failed to show calculations.

1.0 pts

Failed to correctly calculate the number of productive FTEs but included calculations to show attempt.

0.0 pts

No attempt to answer question or inappropriate attempt at calculation.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart B: Question 2
3.0 pts

Successfully explained HPPD and how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining HPPD and/or how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining HPPD and/or how the acuity of the unit would affect HPPD.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart B: Question 3
3.0 pts

Successfully explained how diagnosis related groups (DRG’s) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining how diagnosis related groups (DRG’s) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining how diagnosis related groups (DRG’s) and Case Mix Index (CMI) affects hours per patient day.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart B: Question 4
3.0 pts

Successfully explained outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and recommended changes.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with explaining outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and/or recommended changes.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with explaining outcomes for use in evaluating the staffing plan and/or recommended changes.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Resources
3.0 pts

Successfully utilizes 2 scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

2.0 pts

Successfully utilizes 1 scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

1.0 pts

Utilizes 2 resources but not scholarly reports to justify the discussion presented in Part I.

0.0 pts

Not included or severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, spelling, and APA Formatting
3.0 pts

The assignment follows correct APA formatting for title and reference page, including citations. Free of grammar and spelling errors.

2.0 pts

The assignment contains some (2 or less) APA formatting errors for title and reference page, including citations and/or some grammar and spelling errors.

1.0 pts

The assignment contains significant (more than 2) APA formatting for title and reference page, including citations and/or some grammar and spelling errors.

0.0 pts

Severe issues present in paper.

 

3.0 pts
Total Points: 27.0

 

Rubric

 

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric

 

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric

 

Criteria

 

Ratings

 

Pts

 

This

 

criterion

 

is

 

linked

 

to

 

a

 

Learning

 

Outcome

Part A:

Question 1

 

3.0

 

pts

 

Successfully identified

the nursing

sensitive

indicators.

 

2.0

 

pts

 

Minor issues with the

identification of nursing

sensitive indicators.

 

1.0

 

pts

 

Moderate issues with the

identification of nursing

sensitive indicators.

 

0.0

 

pts

 

Not included or

severe issues

present in paper.

 

 

3.0

 

pts

 

This

 

criterion

 

is

 

linked

 

to

 

a

 

Learning

 

Outcome

Part A:

Question 2

 

Part I: Question 2

 

3.0

 

pts

 

Successfully discussed how

nursing

sensitive indicator

data can be utilized to

enhance safety and quality

of patient care.

 

2.0

 

pts

 

Minor issues with how

the nursing

sensitive

indicators can be

utilized to enhance

safety and quality of

patient care.

 

1.0

 

pts

 

Discussed how nursing

sensitive indicator data

can be utilized to enhance

safety or quality of patient

care (failed to discuss

both).

 

0.0

 

pts

 

Not included

or severe

issues present

in paper.

 

 

3.0

 

pts

 

Rubric

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric

Personnel Budget Case Study Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is

linked to a

Learning

OutcomePart A:

Question 1

3.0 pts

Successfully identified

the nursing-sensitive

indicators.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with the

identification of nursing-

sensitive indicators.

1.0 pts

Moderate issues with the

identification of nursing-

sensitive indicators.

0.0 pts

Not included or

severe issues

present in paper.

 

3.0 pts

This criterion is

linked to a

Learning

OutcomePart A:

Question 2

Part I: Question 2

3.0 pts

Successfully discussed how

nursing-sensitive indicator

data can be utilized to

enhance safety and quality

of patient care.

2.0 pts

Minor issues with how

the nursing-sensitive

indicators can be

utilized to enhance

safety and quality of

patient care.

1.0 pts

Discussed how nursing-

sensitive indicator data

can be utilized to enhance

safety or quality of patient

care (failed to discuss

both).

0.0 pts

Not included

or severe

issues present

in paper.

 

3.0 pts

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW