Less Than Satisfactory

Less Than Satisfactory

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
PSY-838 PSY-838-O500 Benchmark – Work-Based Assessment 242.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (87.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Describe predictive based and criterion based assessment 20.0% Discussion of predictive based and criterion based assessment is either missing or is not evident to the reader. Discussion of predictive based and criterion based assessment is present, but is incomplete. Discussion of predictive based and criterion based assessment is present, but the discussion is cursory and lacking in depth. Discussion of predictive based and criterion based assessment is present. Discussion is detailed and includes most of the necessary elements. Discussion of predictive based and criterion based assessment is present. Discussion is thorough with rich detail and includes all necessary elements. Synthesis of sources is present.
Evaluate empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment 20.0% Evaluation of empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment is either missing or not evident to the reader. Evaluation of empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment is present, but is incomplete. Evaluation of empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment is present, but the description of task details is cursory and lacking in depth. Evaluation of empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment is present and describes task details. Evaluation of empirical support for the theoretical approach that best describes predictive and criterion work-based assessment is present and thoroughly describes task details. Synthesis of sources is present.
Propose strategies to improve work-based assessment (4.4) 15.0% Discussion of strategies to improve work-based assessment is either missing or not evident to the reader. Discussion of strategies to improve work-based assessment is present but incomplete. Discussion of strategies to improve work-based assessment is present but details are cursory. Discussion of strategies to improve work-based assessment is present. The proposed strategies are detailed. Discussion of strategies to improve work-based assessment is present. The proposed strategies are thoroughly discussed. Synthesis of sources is present.
Identify the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment (4.1) 15.0% Discussion and identification of the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment is either missing or not evident to the reader. Discussion and identification of the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment is present. Discussion is incomplete. Discussion and identification of the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment is present. Discussion is done in a cursory manner. Discussion and identification of the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment is present. Discussion is detailed. Discussion and identification of the industrial organizational psychologist role in work-based assessment is present. Discussion is in depth and detailed. Synthesis of sources is present.
Organization and Effectiveness 20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 20.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and comprehensive; the essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. The development indicated by the thesis and/or main claim is acceptable for publication.
Format 10.0%
Mechanics of Writing 5.0% Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
APA Format 5.0% Required format is rarely followed correctly. An appropriate number of topic-related scholarly research sources and related in-text citations is not present. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Required format is attempted, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Some included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Required format is used correctly, although some minor errors may be present. Scholarly research sources are present and topic-related, but the source and quality of some references is questionable. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Required format is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Scholarly research accounts for the majority of sources presented and is topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. The document is correctly formatted to publication standards. All research presented is scholarly, topic-related, and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. The paper could readily be accepted for publication.
Total Weightage

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW