Language Use and Audience Awareness

Top of Form

CLC – Community Assessment and Analysis Presentation 

 

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 83.00% 4 Good 94.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
90.0 %Content  
25.0 %Description of Community and Community Boundaries: (People, Geographic, Geopolitical , Financial, Ethnic, Phenomenological Features and Types of Interactions, Goals, Interests, Barriers, and Challenges) Description of boundaries of community is omitted. Description of community and boundaries is unclear or incomplete; missing one or more necessary components to give context to the community assessment. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete; a brief description of all components is offered. Description of community and boundaries of community is complete and components of community functioning are discussed in sufficient depth. Description of community is complete. Boundaries are described in great detail, distinguishing environmental boundaries, environmental relationships, and external systems that comprise the open, community system.  
25.0 %Summary of Community Health Assessment Community assessment is omitted. Community assessment is provided but discussion is vague or incomplete. Community assessment is complete, and a synopsis of each Functional Health Pattern (FHP) is included. Nursing process and Functional Health Patterns (FHP) are identified with clear indications for actual, at-risk and potential for improved health. Discussion of Functional Health Patterns is clear, complete, and comprehensive, with indications for actual, at-risk and potential diagnoses as well as recommendations for surveillance and preventive measures.  
15.0 %Conclusion With Summary of Findings and Impressions of General Community Health Conclusion is omitted. Conclusion is incomplete or unclear. Conclusion is complete, with general summary of findings. Conclusion is clear, with a comprehensive discussion of findings and general health of the community. Conclusion is comprehensive, with a detailed summary of key findings that explains general health of the community and offers rationale for recommendations.  
15.0 %Summary of Interview With Community Health/Public Health Provider Summary table is omitted. Summary table is incomplete or unclear. Summary table includes all Functional Health Patterns with adequate documentation. Summary table is clear, with a detailed and comprehensive description of findings from an assessment of the chosen community. Summary table is comprehensive, with a detailed description of findings, as well as actual, at-risk, and potential diagnoses and recommendations for surveillance and preventative measures.  
10.0 %Participation Participation is not evident. Participation does not encourage further discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is critical, argumentative, or confrontational. Individual group contributions are submitted extremely late, affecting the group’s ability to accomplish a successful task. Cooperative teamwork is not evident. Participation encourages discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is professional and exhibits a positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual contributions are submitted but not on time. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited but limited. Participation encourages further discussion and dialogue with other students in the class. Participation is professional and exhibits a positive attitude that is respectful of others. Individual contributions are provided by the designated timeline. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited but not consistently. All participation encourages further discussion and extensive dialogue with other students in the class. Participation demonstrates a critical analysis of classmates’ participation and provides relevant and constructive feedback. Individual contributions are provided before the designated timeline. Cooperative teamwork is exhibited in order to complete the project.  
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text Complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.  
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.  
     

 

Bottom of Form

 
     

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW