Introduction 2 Governmental Purpose and Architectural Implications of UK Building Regulation 2…

Introduction 2
Governmental Purpose and Architectural Implications of UK Building Regulation 2
Advantageous Circumstances for Architectural Limited Liability Companies 3
Differences of Architecture Design Responsibility in ‘Design and Build’ and ‘Traditional’
Contracting 4
Limitations of BIM Systems on Architectural Practices 5
Protection of Title “Architect” in the UK 6
Why were the RIBA fee scales abolished? 7
Conclusion 8
References 9
For the development of new building, and for the subject of building to a major glazing
requirements, refurbishment for crucial locations are provided in the publications of a number
of British Standards and Building Regulations. A number of different British Standards and
Building Regulations have been stated at different points of time and in a separate way. With
respect to this result, even though the reason for these are more or less the same, there may be
variations in the presentation as well as the wording. Building regulations are referred to as
building a set of rules, code that contributes in specifying the minimum level being accepted
related to safety for the objects being constructed (Speight and Stone 2004). Building
regulations are known to be statutory instruments that seek on ensuring that the policies set
by the construction organizations are in accordance with the act established by the UK.
This essay will be discussing certain concepts related to regulation, office structures,
procurement, and management of construction, professionalism and pay in the industry of
Governmental Purpose and Architectural Implications of UK Building
Architecture has been identified as the regulated profession in the United Kingdom and there
is a protective shield of the title rather than the functions of architecture. There are certain
frameworks of law that have been having huge implications over the architecture. The
architects act 1997 plays the role of the most important framework of law in the United
Kingdom. Hence, it can be stated that the profession of architecture in the United Kingdom
has to be having registration under the Board of Architects Registration for practicing the
utilization of ‘architect’ as a title (RIBA 1999). This Board is the competent authority and
statutory regulator for architects in the United Kingdom.
As a statutory regulatory the role of the Board is focused on the maintenance of being
registered as an architect and for ensuring that standards in the profession of architects are
being maintained in a consistent manner for being beneficial for the architects as well as the
public. Considering the ARB criteria GC4, there is a major impact of the ability for the
generation of design proposal to use the understanding on the regulatory body of knowledge,
some at the present academic discipline with respect to architecture along with borders of
practices in professionalism (Speight and Stone 2004). It also has a major impact on the
ability for applying a range of methods for communication and media for presenting the
This is helps in understanding the alternate techniques, process and materials that can be
applied to the design of architecture and construction of building. With the help of this, there
will be a major impact on the theories related to urban planning and designing the
communities. This influences the development and design of the cities, present and past over
On the other hand, GC6 contributes to understand this particular profession and the role
played by architects in the society, specifically the preparation of briefs that have the
accountability of social factors. GC10 impacts the important skills of design for meeting the
requirements of building users in the constraints that are being imposed by the factors of cost
and the regulations of building. The mechanism of cost control are also influenced that
operate in the duration of developing the project (RIBA 1999). GC11 impacts appropriate
knowledge related to the procedures, regulations, organizations and industries involved
within the translation of concepts related to the design into integrating plans and buildings in
Advantageous Circumstances for Architectural Limited Liability
A number of architectural organizations of UK have been making the choice of organizing
themselves as Limited Liability Companies (LLC). This form of company is the combination
of partnership advantages of pass by operational and taxation flexibility with that of the
corporate advantage of having the protection of limited liability (Pevsner 2007). This
contributes in making an attractive entity of the business.
However, the benefits of having this form are highly dependent on the treatment of LLC as a
partnership for the purposes of state and federal income tax. The act committed towards this
form of company states that the classification of the company will be done as a partnership
for the purposes of tax in UK only if the classification has been done for the purposes of
federal tax. The purposes of federal tax are determined on the basis of how measurement is
done at the company in consideration with four main characteristics of the company (RIBA
1999). These are freely transferring the interest, limited liability, management beingcentralized and the continuity of life. The three circumstances that can be beneficial for this
particular form of company will be discussed below.
If there is a specific amount of capital being authorized of the amount of company, the
determination of this is done in an appropriate manner by the local jurisdiction, at the time of
making payment. Another beneficial situation is that as per the article of association being
stated by the organization give that majority of the directors and the chairman of the company
have been registered as an architect as mentioned above (RIBA 1999). In addition to this, if
the business of the organization is under the management and control of a director of the
organization who has availed registration as an architect who is also an ordinary resident
under the local jurisdiction, the situation might be a beneficial one.
Differences of Architecture Design Responsibility in ‘Design and Build’
Design- build is referred to as a system for the delivery of project utilized in the industry of
construction. It is referred to as a method for delivering a project within which there is
contracting of services related to construction and design by an individual entity also referred
to as the design- build contractor or the design- builder. The design- build is relied upon an
individual point of contract with responsibility and is utilized for minimizing the level of
risks for the owner of the project and for reducing the schedule of delivery by an overlap in
the phase of designing and the phase of construction for the project (Pevsner 2007). With its
responsibility of single point, design build carries clarity in the remedies of contract for the
clients as the contractor of design- build will be having the responsibility for each and every
work related to the project, irrespective of the nature of being a default.
On the other hand, the traditional form of approach for the projects of construction constitutes
the designer being appointed on one side of the coin, and contractor being appointed on the
other side of the coin. The route of procurement by design build contributes in changing the
traditional or previous sequence of work being performed (Duffy and Hutton 1998). It
contributes in answering the wishes of the clients for the responsibility of single point. This
attempt is focused on reducing the level of risks and the entire amount of costs. This can now
be used for a number different forms of contract having huge availability.
At some point of times, design- build is compared to one of the most significant traditional
approach in the procedure of construction. In comparison with the design build method, it has
been found that the traditional method, from the perspective of the past is an extremely recent
concept (Chappell and Christopher 2005). However, the concept of design build had been
used since a longer duration of time. The increase in the project delivery of design build has
contributed in threatening the hierarchies of the traditional method, and silos related to the
industry of construction and design. With respect to this result, there has been emergence of a
debate regarding the method for the delivery of project.
Critics regarding the approach of design- build claims that there is limitation of design build
over the involvement of clients within the design and alleging the contractors who often have
been making decision of design beyond the area with respect to expertise (Gotch 2007).
These also provide suggestion that a designer, instead of the professional of construction, is
an improved advocate for the owner of project or the client and that by the representation of
varying perspectives and the ones that remain within the scope of different spheres, builders
and designers finally that contributes in creating better and improved buildings.
It has been stated that this approach contributes in saving money and time with respect to the
owner, when there is provision of opportunity for the achievement of innovation within the
facility of delivery. It has also been noted that this approach allows the owners for avoiding
to be placed in a direct manner amongst the contractor and the architect. Under the traditional
approach, the owners end up taking a number of risks due to the position (HMSO 1973). The
approach of design build places the responsibility for designing the errors and omitting the
builder of the design. This relieves the owner having major responsibilities related to
management and law. The burden of the respective amount of costs and related risks, there is
transfer taking place in the team of design- build.
Limitations of BIM Systems on Architectural Practices
For understanding the disadvantages of BIM, it is important for defining what is referred to as
BIM that stands for Building Information Modeling. There are a number of ways in which
BIM can be defined, and each one of these contribute to indicate the partially built capability
for the philosophy of BIM that is holistic in nature. BIM contributes in offering the promise
of double- edge in order to displace abstraction alongside with simulation (HSE 1992). The
work being done be an architect is focused on bringing concepts in the fundamental base.
This results in the conversion of potentiality in comparison with the actual ones.
Feedback of user is provided and then the object being anchored are improved and modified.
Thus, in the tools of BIM have the need for the facilitation of iterative cycle. The tool of BIM
has continuously been missing the concept of simplicity within the design that is offered by
the utilization of paper and pen (Hubert 2006). The offer of paper and pen is on analyzing the
complicated systems that assist in allowing the analysis of human brains regarding a number
of options at the same point of time. BIM contributes in shifting the focus away from the
requirements of the final users by creating a focus over the objects related to construction in
opposition of the elements related to architecture.
For the purpose of an architect, BIM creates a concentration instead of too much to the
sources for the representation of the final different types of the design. However, on the other
hand, designers also need to be continuously streaming the information, advice, and
abstractions for the facilitation within the movement from the information to distill the
knowledge (Pevsner 2007). Even though utilizing the lean concepts, there is willingness for
creating a flow in the concepts and idea developing by the process of architecture, there are
differences involved in the processes of thought between the management of practice,
production and design, creating a number of difficulties.
However, BIM has the potentiality for illuminating specific omissions and errors. Yet, it is
important for being aware in comparison with a number of types of errors will not
importantly be flagged up utilizing the systems of BIM. As the systems have been designed
in a manner that is digital in nature, BIM seems to be having the opportunity and possibility
for the integration with these specific systems (Thorne 2008). It is not correct for viewing
these systems that are isolated, and it is more adequate for thinking of a change from the
process driven by document to the integrated knowledge, information or data driven process
related by the exchange of data. Whether there is consideration of wisdom, knowledge,
information, or data, there is an existence of a number of mechanisms for the purpose of its
transfer. This approach of integration aims on taking the advantage related to the synergy for
the systems of business. The achievement of this can be done relation and normalization of
data in the entire operations of the business.
Protection of Title “Architect” in the UK
In the nation of UK, the Architect Act 1997 places restrictions over the utilization of the
style, name or title “architecture” considering the connecting link with the practice of
profession or the business. For this particular purpose, there is the requirement of registration
for being maintained in a significant manner. As per what has been stated in the subsection
(20)1 of this particular act, an individual as a local resident on the UK may only be practicing
or carrying on business activities under the title, style or name that consists the term
‘architect’ if under registration. There is no involvement of a restriction over being utilized in
any of the significant circumstances (RIBA 1999). The words stated in the present act
contributed in following those of the act under the ones in decision that the utilization of
“FRIBA” suffix within the notepaper of the business constituting the infringement.
In accordance with the subsection 20(3), partnerships, firms or bodies can be carrying on
business within the title, style or name consisting the term “architect” given that in wider
terms, the business of architecture is run by the professional who has been registered under
law stated by the UK. However, the board of statutory registration may be effectively limiting
the ways in which subsection 20(3) is applied to those partnerships or firms of corporate
bodies who have contributed in supplying the information important for the determination of
the fact as to if the business of architecture is being run by a person who is registered (RIBA
2001). The power of rule- make under the subsection of 20(4), this seems to be limited
towards prescription of specific information for being given to the board. This means that
such information is important for the determination of statutory registration as to if it can be
applied. The subsection contributes in making no provision for being levied at a free cost.
The main point of debate is with respect to the fact if the principle for the protection of title is
appropriate or not. As per the Fast Company, the main issue involved is nothing with respect
to legality and shows all concern towards the importance. With the passage of time, a number
of young architect have been looking for ways across the licensure by obtaining engineers for
signing off the buildings along with other related tricks (RIBA 2008). This protection of title
is done in favor of the public interest, for the establishment of legal and technical
responsibility with respect to a specific job. It also helps in establishing and legitimizing a
specific body of knowledge that states that this particular knowledge is important for the
Why were the RIBA fee scales abolished?
Fees that are charged by the architects vary in a highly significant manner, and with the
Royal Institute of British Architect (RIBA), there had been an abolishment of the indicative
scales for the payment of fees. RIBA had been playing a significant role to affect the
environment of the construction industry, unrecognized and unsupported by the profession
(RIBA 2003). There are a number of architects who within the fields of stage and set design,
art of the public, design of installation, design of the brand, design related to the space in
public, consultation to the community, think tanks, research and the urban form of design,
along with ones who work on the side of demand of more traditional contracts of building.
The younger professionals with this field have been expressing a strong desire for being a
part of this particular highly broader point of being reached, concept of inter- disciplines
related to the practices of architecture that provide suggestion regarding the future of having a
lenient definition and modes of practices that are more slipper (Sharp 1991). The RIBA might
feel the need for considering the evolution of the definition provided in the 20th century, of
what value it is to be given the title of architect for fitting better with the reality related to the
Communities related to the practice end up going certain way in order to be successful to fill
the gap that the organizations with membership had been left behind. However, performing
work towards a wider definition of the architect would be positioning the graduates for
moving into the paths of career that lead towards a broader range of roles within the
environment built for the profession and for giving a better respond to the changes within the
nature being practices (Speight and Stone 2004). For being able to survive, the architects
must be focused on designing not just the building, and in return should be given support for
doing so by the bodies of membership and the regulations of concern.
In context with this essay, it can be stated that the work being performed by the profession of
architect are important factors for driving the society of UK in a significant and successful
manner. The reflection of these expertise can be seen in a strong reputation being built across
the globe (Thorne 2008). For complying with the Building Act 1984, along with the
subsequent instruments of the statutory government also referred to as the building
regulation, there is an increased need for considering the approval of building regulation for
the construction of specific structure within this industry of the United Kingdom.
In context with this essay, it can also be stated that certain services can be undertaken only by
the professional of architect is there is specific identification of these within the documents
being appointed, and in a different situation, there will be no inclusion of this in the structure
of fee (William 1996). Hence, it can be finally concluded that the main issue involved is
nothing with respect to legality and shows all concern towards the importance. In addition to
this, it has been found that a number of young architect have been looking for ways across the
licensure by obtaining engineers for signing off the buildings along with other related tricks.

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"