Interview with a Nurse Information Expert Rubric

1. Select your interviewee and schedule an interview. This individual must be a Registered Nurse. Job titles of RNs who may be considered include, but are not limited to, nursing clinical information manager, super user, director/manager clinical education, chief information officer, quality assurance or performance improvement nurse, nurse informaticist, telenursing specialist, nurse abstractor, case manager, or compliance nurse. If you have any concerns about whether the RN is suitable for this assignment, contact your instructor before you schedule the interview.

2. Review all questions (areas of inquiry) on the Interview Form prior to conducting the interview. You may print the form and take it with you to the interview.

3. Note that there are five required questions to ask the RN.

4. Note that there are four optional questions. You need to select only one of these to ask the RN.

5. Note that there are two follow-up questions you must answer.

6. Prior to conducting your interview, review two scholarly resources. These resources should guide your understanding of the RN’s role and responsibilities or make you more knowledgeable about GIGO, interprofessional communication, or other key concepts in the questions that you may not fully understand. For example, if your interviewee is a telenurse, you would want to review information on this specialty. If you do not know what GIGO means, look it up.

7. Conduct your interview. The length of your interview will vary but should not exceed 1 hour.

8. Submit the completed interview form prior to the deadline outlined above.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Rubric

NR361 Interview with a Nurse Information Expert Rubric

NR361 Interview with a Nurse Information Expert Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemographics

Initials, job title of interviewee that includes the type of nursing information role and date of interview provided.

5.0 pts

Initials, job title, the type of nursing information expert and date of interview are provided.

4.0 pts

Either initials, job title, or date of interview is missing. The type of nursing information expert is included.

3.0 pts

Name is provided instead of initials. Job title or date of interview is missing. The type of nursing information expert is included.

2.0 pts

Name is provided but no job title, nursing information expert or date of interview.

0.0 pts

No name, job title, nursing information expert or date of interview provided.

 

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Question #1 (Career Path)

Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

25.0 pts

Clearly describes career path including education and experiences.

22.0 pts

Describes career path but education OR experiences are not provided.

20.0 pts

Describes career path but does not include experiences and educational background.

10.0 pts

Briefly describes career path.

0.0 pts

Fails to describe career path.

 

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Question #2 (Value of Evidence)

Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

25.0 pts

Clearly states value of best practice as a driving force and provides key elements.

22.0 pts

States value of best practice as a driving force and provides most key elements.

20.0 pts

Describes value of best practice as a driving force but omitted some key elements.

10.0 pts

Briefly describes value of best practice as a driving force and omitted key elements.

0.0 pts

Does not discuss value of best evidence.

 

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Question #3 (Support Tools)

Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

25.0 pts

Clearly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices and provides key elements.

22.0 pts

Describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practices and provides most key elements.

20.0 pts

Describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice but omitted some key elements.

10.0 pts

Briefly describes safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice but omitted key elements.

0.0 pts

Does not describe safeguards and decision-making support tools that support safe practice.

 

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Question #4 (Pt. Care Technologies)

Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

25.0 pts

Names/lists four or more technologies that improved patient care.

22.0 pts

Names/lists three technologies that improved patient care.

20.0 pts

Names/lists two technologies that improved patient care.

10.0 pts

Names/lists one technology that improved patient care.

0.0 pts

Names/lists zero to one technologies that improved patient care.

 

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired Question #5 (Groups and Utilization)

Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

25.0 pts

Names/lists three or more groups that rely on information/data AND describes in detail how information is utilized.

22.0 pts

Names/lists one to two groups that rely on information/data AND generally describes how information is utilized.

20.0 pts

Names/lists groups but does not describe how information is utilized AND briefly describes how information is utilized.

10.0 pts

Names/lists one group but does not describe how information is utilized.

0.0 pts

Does not name/list groups and does not describe how information is utilized.

 

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOptional Question

Type the optional question that you chose to ask. Provide a paraphrased or summary of the interviewee’s answer. You may quote the interviewee, but sparingly. Do NOT provide a verbatim transcript of everything that was said.

30.0 pts

Clearly indicates which optional question was asked. Clearly describes answer to optional question in detail.

26.0 pts

Indicates which optional question was asked. Briefly provides answer to optional question.

24.0 pts

Indicates which optional question was asked, but answer does not address the question.

11.0 pts

Indicates which question was asked but does not provide an answer.

0.0 pts

Does not include optional question or answer.

 

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Question #1 (Practice Impact)

Summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers. Describes how nursing practice will change as a result of learning about roles and responsibilities of interviewee.

30.0 pts

Clearly summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers. Clearly describes how personal nursing practice will change as a result of learning about roles and responsibilities of interviewee.

26.0 pts

Generally summarizes what was learned from interaction with interviewee answers. Generally describes how personal nursing practice will change.

24.0 pts

Minimally summarizes what was learned. Gives a brief description of how personal nursing practice will change.

11.0 pts

Includes summary or describes how personal nursing practice will change, BUT does not include both.

0.0 pts

Fails to summarize what was learned and fails to describe how personal nursing practice will change.

 

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFollow-Up Question #2 (Resources Utilized)

Names two scholarly resources reviewed prior to conducting interview. Describes how each resource helped student prepare for interview.

30.0 pts

Specifically names two scholarly resources reviewed prior to interview. Clearly states how each resource helped prepare for interview.

26.0 pts

Specifically names two scholarly resources reviewed prior to interview. Generally states how each resource helped prepare for interview.

24.0 pts

Specifically names only one scholarly resource reviewed prior to interview. Briefly states how the resource helped prepare for interview.

11.0 pts

Names scholarly resources but does not indicate how resources helped prepare for interview.

0.0 pts

Fails to indicate resources.

 

30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Writing

Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Punctuation, APA format and sentence structure are correct. Evidence of spell and grammar check.

5.0 pts

Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Punctuation, APA format and sentence structure are correct.

4.0 pts

Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Minimal punctuation, sentence structure errors noted. No indications of grammar, APA format or spelling errors noted.

3.0 pts

Name of student and date of interview appears on Interview Form. Several punctuation, sentence-structure errors noted. Minor indications of grammar, APA or spelling errors noted.

2.0 pts

Name of student or date of interview is on Interview Form. Numerous punctuation, sentence-structure errors noted. Many indications of grammar, APA format or spelling errors noted.

0.0 pts

Name of student or date of interview is missing. Many punctuation, APA or sentence structure errors noted. Spelling errors not corrected prior to submission of assignment.

 

5.0 pts
Total Points: 225.0

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW