Intervention using behavioral techniques

Intervention using behavioral techniques

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
Benchmark – Personal Behavior Modification
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Satisfactory (75.00%) Good (85.00%) Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 70.0%
Definition of behavior and desire for change 15.0% Definition of behavior and desire for change is not present or not discernible to the reader. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Definition of behavior and desire for change is incomplete or flawed. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. Definition of behavior and desire for change is accurate and complete. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Definition of behavior and desire for change is thorough and well-reasoned. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. Definition of behavior and desire for change is thorough, well-reasoned, fully supported, and rich in detail. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences 20.0% Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences is not present or not discernible to the reader. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences is incomplete or flawed. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences is accurate and complete. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences is thorough and well-reasoned. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. Behavior tracking including antecedents and consequences is thorough, well-reasoned, fully supported, and rich in detail. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Intervention using behavioral techniques 15.0% Intervention using behavioral techniques is not present or not discernible to the reader. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is incomplete or flawed. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is accurate and complete. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is thorough and well-reasoned. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is thorough, well-reasoned, fully supported, and rich in detail. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Results of behavioral intervention (C4.1) 20.0% Intervention using behavioral techniques is not present or not discernible to the reader. Essay does not demonstrate understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is incomplete or flawed. Essay demonstrates a poor understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is accurate and complete. Essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is thorough and well-reasoned. Essay demonstrates an understanding that extends beyond the surface of the topic. Intervention using behavioral techniques is thorough, well-reasoned, fully supported, and rich in detail. Essay demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format 30.0%
Layout 10.0% The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 10.0% Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW