Impact of Leadership on employees Participation in Abbott Laboratories. – GradSchoolPapers.com

Stuck with a difficult assignment? No time to get your paper done? Feeling confused? If you’re looking for reliable and timely help for assignments, you’ve come to the right place. We promise 100% original, plagiarism-free papers custom-written for you. Yes, we write every assignment from scratch and it’s solely custom-made for you.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Impact of Leadership on employees Participation in Abbott Laboratories.
Order Description
Title: Impact of Leadership on employees Participation in Abbott Laboratories
? Abstract (not included in words count) A short summary of the proposal
? Introduction: (1000 Words)
• Including Research questions, aims and Objectives.
• Highlights key debates, problem statement, key academic debates
• Spell out topic and context to the reader
• Details Research Aims and Objectives
• Explains why research is important (and exciting!)
• Defines Research question(s) (focused)
• Other background material to topic and context
• Concise– don’t waste words on this section
• Sets the tone and will be read in detail
• Clear – reader MUST know easily:
? What the aims and objectives are;
? What the research questions are;
? What the problem/theme is and
? Why it is important to research
Signposts – tells the reader what will be in the project and how it will be structured
? Literature Review: (4000 words)
• Sections – do not just produce one lump of text!!
• Must be critical – evaluate not repeat the literature
• Structured around themes not authors
• Sections must flow logically usually from the universal to the specific
• MUST track back to your objectives and illuminate your research questions – the gaps in the literature – which you will now address in your own study
• Definitions and theories start from general concept till specify to solve the questions.
• Contents:
? mostly academic sources i.e. journals c 80%
? remainder may be other sources e.g. credible websites
? Avoid non-peer reviewed sites such as Wikis.
? Style:
o Not factual
o Review and criticise the literature in the context of your objectives/topic. Don’t do a report do a review.
o Synthesise literature – don’t adopt a source by source approach
o You might find it useful to summarise the review by way of a conceptual/theoretical framework (we will cover this)
? Methodology:(2000 Words) here I am using archived data based in qualitative concept:
? Identify and explain your own research philosophy and approach
? Outline and justify your chosen research design
? Describe and justify what you did
o Data collection
o Data analysis
? Identify any ethical or practical constraints and challenges and state how they were managed
? You should refer to published work on methodology here
? Style:
• Not overly factual – don’t give a lecture on research philosophies etc.
• Be argumentative: in other words . . . argue the case for your chosen method, why you have a particular philosophical position, approach etc..
• Cross reference other authors and their methods
? Finding and Discussions: (4000 words)
• Summarise your findings using tables, text boxes, graphs, series of indicative quotations etc.
• Organise it in a way that address your research questions in a logical way
• The facts don’t speak for themselves
o Under each table/section/quotation you MUST include an explanatory paragraph
• Use exceptions – flag only the items of importance in your work – these will be discussed in the next chapter
• Signpost important points well (to sow seeds for discussion in next chapter)
• Save your discussion points for the next chapter
• Often an easy chapter!
• Discuss your own findings in comparison to the literature review
• What did you find out that is the same; different; surprising; amplifying etc.?
Style:
• Critical, comparative and reflective.
• Reflect upon your own results and the view from your literature.
• How do your findings contrast with the literature?
• Don’t just restate what you and the literature tell us.
? Conclusions:(500 Words)
• WARNING – TAKE THIS SECTION SERIOUSLY!
• Give yourself the time and space to do it properly
• It is not just an afterthought it will be read more closely than other sections so it needs to be GOOD!
• Basically distil your discussion points into a verdict that satisfactorily answers all your research questions
– Don’t just restate findings
Style:
• Confident, synthesizing and authoritative
• In-depth: don’t just write a paragraph!
• Link your findings back to your Objectives/ Research Question
? Recommendations:(500 Words)
• On the basis of what you have found out what would be your suggestions for
– Future research and why?
– Strategy and practice for corporates and why?
– A proposed plan for action by the business or other wider stakeholders if relevant.
• Style
– Bold, explanatory and confident
– Less critical than other sections but In-depth
? References(not included in words count) All Harvard
? Appendix (not included in words count)
The project format
• 12,000 words as per above guidance for each sector.
• Use 12 point font – Verdana/Times New Roman or any sensible alternative!
Please not like this . . . or this as it will look really odd!!!
• Use 1.5 point spacing
• Use at least 1.5cm margins top and bottom and each side
• Fully referenced using Harvard System
Dissertation marking criteria
• 5% Aims, Objectives and research questions are feasible, clear, and logical and add to existing academic and professional practice debates.
• 5% Logical structure/narrative: e.g., correct sequencing of sections; piece does not stray from the RQs.Presentation reflects Masters Level, including referencing.
• 20% Literature review is critical and thorough: evidence of critique and reflection; use of quality sources and fully referenced. Literature review develops a conceptual framework from which research questions emerge.
• 20% Research methodologies and methods of data collection and analysis are justified, fully explained and appropriate to the research questions / issues / problems identified. Reflection on challenges faced and how they were addressed if necessary.
• 30% Findings accurately and appropriately presented. Critical analysis of findings synthesised with literature review evident in discussion.
• 20% Conclusions and recommendations follow on naturally. Implications for future research are discussed. A sensible proposal plan for action by the organisation is provided if relevant.

Writerbay.net

We’ve proficient writers who can handle both short and long papers, be they academic or non-academic papers, on topics ranging from soup to nuts (both literally and as the saying goes, if you know what we mean). We know how much you care about your grades and academic success. That's why we ensure the highest quality for your assignment. We're ready to help you even in the most critical situation. We're the perfect solution for all your writing needs.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper