Stuck with a difficult assignment? No time to get your paper done? Feeling confused? If you’re looking for reliable and timely help for assignments, you’ve come to the right place. We promise 100% original, plagiarism-free papers custom-written for you. Yes, we write every assignment from scratch and it’s solely custom-made for you.
Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper
i need help with this
i need help with this
Annotated Bibliography The Basics An Annotated Bibliography is a list of sources (eg. books, academic journals, websites, etc.) that you used to research the topic you have chosen for your research essay. In an Annotated Bibliography each source is listed and followed by an overview and evaluation of the source. For a brief outline of information see The Empowered Writer, p. 117. Connections to Course Objectives Organize information into a clear, coherent messages Evaluate information for currency, reliability, authority and purpose Show academic integrity by integrating a documentation system to acknowledge sources How to do this assignment Choose a research topic from the list posted in the Assignment section. Alternative topics can be chosen after consultation with the instructor (Consider using the Canadian Points of View Reference Center available through the Library Database as a place to search for other possible topics) Review relevant literature to get a better understanding of your topic overall and for the debate that surrounds the issue. Identify your position on the issue to focus your research. You may have to revise your position during the. That is fine! This should just a starting point. For the purposes of the Annotated Bibliography, use the Georgian College Library Multi-Search tool to identify THREE (3) credible sources on your topic, including: Book/E-Book, Academic journal article, Internet source – you will NOT use the Georgian database for this Develop an annotation for each source. EACH annotation should come in three parts: Part A: Full APA reference entry at the top of the page. Organize your sources in alphabetical order as you would in an APA reference list. Part B: Your summary should 75-150 words, but equally as important, it should effectively summarize the main argument(s)/thesis and key evidence/information in the source. This should be in your own words and should NOT be a simple summary of the abstract. Part C: Evaluate each source using the C.R.A.A.P. Model discussed in class. Provide 2-3 sentences for each aspect of the model reflected in the criteria below. You should include specific information as justification for your discussion around each evaluation criteria. IMPORTANT: Use the handout posted to Blackboard for a more detailed breakdown of the model and to develop your evaluations. You may need to respond to more than one question to provide sufficient detail per criteria: NOTE: Please start each source on a NEW page and indicate which part of the CRAAP model you are referring to in your evaluation. Carefully proofread your writing for spelling/grammar errors. The assignment must be formatted according to APA guidelines for formatting and citation. See rubric below Annotated Bibliography Rubric Criteria Level 4 80%-100% Level 3 70%-79% Level 2 60%-69% Level 1 0%-59% Summary Summaries clearly and engagingly identify the focus of the source, the author and title, and the main argument (s) and key information. Sources are clearly relevant to topic. Summaries identify the focus of the source, the author and title, and the main argument (s) and key information. Sources are relevant to topic. Summaries only vaguely identify the focus of the source, the author and title, and the main argument (s) and key information. Sources are not very relevant to topic. Summaries are missing or do not identify the focus of the source, the author and title, and the main argument(s) and key information. Sources are not relevant to topic. Evaluation/CRAP Model Evaluations provide thorough and engaging review of the source according to the criteria in the CRAP model. Clear and accurate supporting details are included to justify the evaluations. Evaluations provide a review of the sources according to the criteria in the CRAP model. Evaluations are justified using detail from the sources. Evaluations provide vague or incomplete reviews of the sources according to the CRAP model. Some parts of the evaluation justified using supporting detail from the sources, however this is inconsistent. Evaluations are missing or do not provide review of the sources following the CRAP model. Ineffective justification provided for evaluations. APA Style APA format is complete including: cover page, running header, page numbers, title, indented paragraphs, proper reference format. Elements of APA format or citation are missing or there is a major error with one element: cover page, running header, page numbers, title, indented paragraphs, proper reference format. Several elements of APA format or citation are missing or there are serious errors: cover page, running header, page numbers, title, indented paragraphs, proper reference format. Major errors with elements of APA format or citation or elements are missing: cover page, running header, page numbers, title, indented paragraphs, proper reference format. Writing Mechanics Writing errors will result in a deduction of marks up to 5 marks