Examples of what was said
Running Head: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 1
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE 6
Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations
Emergent trends indicate that offering efficient care to the old and frail adults has become an important aspect of healthcare reforms. For instance, fall-prevention technology is being appreciated as one way of improving outcomes, especially when the clients are to remain in nursing homes (Burns & Grove, 2011). Numerous studies have been undertaken to determine the number and scope of emergency room visits and readmission among the older people using fall-prevention technology technologies versus those enjoying the usual care (Vandenberg, van Beijnum, Overdevest, Capezuti, & Johnson, 2017).
According to Vandenberg et al. (2017), the use of fall-prevention technology technologies gives the patients a sense of security and their confidence is boosted even as they choose to remain in nursing homes. There is also the analysis how this kind of technology impact on the workflow. This paper is a critical analysis of Vandenberg et al. (2017), and it aims at bringing out the issues which motivated them into conducting this research, their choice of the methodology, results of their study, as well as ethical considerations.
Background of the Study
The Vandenberg et al. (2017) study was motivated by the need to understand if extended alarm services which utilized fall detectors as well as bed occupancy sensors ended-up streamlining the workflow. The target population is the members of the older generation in community dwellings, and these are people who have had recurrent falls. If the pieces of technology did streamline the workflow, the researcher hoped to recommend their use among this type of clients.
The researcher feels that such an understanding is paramount since it could avail significant and immediate gains in the social lives of those involved as well as their relatives and friends. Above all, the use could mean that the chances of ultimate recovery are exceptionally increased. Even though these devices are costly and some of the participants felt that they would not normally use them as it is an additional expense, they do appreciate that they are beneficial particularly in cases where individuals happen to fall badly. This is a scenario where people could really want to embrace the use of an emergent technology, but they keep on postponing the idea to delay the cost and hope that they may never have to incur it (Vandenberg et al., 2017).
In case it is determined that these devices are valuable, the researcher hopes to make a persuasive recommendation towards encouraging their use. This is a worthy course, and the goal is to answer the questions:
i. Is fall-prevention technology effective?
ii. What circumstances make fall-prevention technology intervention effective?
iii. Which patients stand to benefit the most from the interventions?
iv. When and for how long should they be utilized?
The first question determines the degree to which this emergent technology could be successful and produce the desired results. Of course, not in every scenario they could be thought of as coming in handy. Consequently, the second question is about those instances when they ought to be encouraged, that is, if they are indeed valuable. There is a host of patients needing assistance, and the third question is to determine who exactly need this. Some of the participants argue that they feel as if the technology invades their privacy, and hence the need to determine (through the inclusion of the fourth question) when and how the technology ought to be exploited .
The Methodology of the Study
The qualitative methods are appropriate since the idea is to know people’s experiences. There is also the need to understand how the other stakeholders have felt about it. When responding to some of the questions posted to them, the respondents aired their feelings as well as the views that other people have had about the idea of using fall-prevention technology. This study was clearly developed from the perspective of the client. It is all about the client since this is the center of focus (Vandenberg et al.,exam 2017).
The author worked hard to cite both qualitative and quantitative studies. Most of them were within the 5-year limit. At least this availed the understanding about the current trends, and the researcher had the basis for understanding the present as well as predicting the immediate future. In pinpointing the research gap, the researcher based their view on a host of past studies and although several did indicate the value of fall-prevention technology, just a handful touched on the aspect of confidence building. In fact, this one still did not go far enough. It is based on this observation that Vandenberg et al. (2017) is anchored.
The Results of the Study
The findings have the capacity to make a positive contribution towards achieving rehabilitation . This is especially in regard to those making recovery from fall experiences. One of the main challenges if using fall-prevention technology according to Vandenberg et al. (2017) is that the patients do not like the feeling of being controlled. They prefer controlling the tool instead. On the overall, nonetheless, this is a plus as explained by the researcher. It should be embraced in the timeliest manner possible (Vandenberg et al., 2017).
Even though the study has concluded that fall-prevention technology is really needed, professionals ought to ensure that an appropriate environment is created and facilitated to make this kind of monitoring helpful to all those involved. Fall-prevention technology would impact positively on nursing as a practice and, consequently, the various schools of nursing would need to start teaching it and also trying to improve on its administration. Every aspect of nursing stands to gain in the process, and Vandenberg et al. (2017) is a commendable contribution towards this effort .
This study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board, and the welfare of the human subjects of the activity was protected as much as possible. For instance, the guiding principles included the respect for the respondents, ensuring beneficence , facilitation of justice during interviews, respect for the members of the targeted population and the community in general, as well as contextual caring. There was a collaborative model where researcher-participant relationship was established and natured. The respondents felt supported, and this was rewarding in the sense that they did open-up and made their views and concerns heard (Vandenberg et al., 2017).
Fall-prevention technology refers to the application of information as well as communication technologies in monitoring and transmitting data associated with the health statuses of the patients. They come in handy when the practitioner must observe and evaluate the physical conditions of individuals who happen to be geographically separated. The use of these electronic devices and associated software means that a practitioner does not have to embark on a journey to see the client uncritically. Such visits and resources are allocated in accordance to the need (Vandenberg et al., 2017). Therefore, it is evident that this study did achieve remarkable success in regard to suggesting the kinds of improvements which could be made as a result of using fall-prevention technology.
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier
Vandenberg, A.E., van Beijnum, B.J., Overdevest, V.G.P., Capezuti, E., & Johnson, T.M. (2017, July-Aug.). US and Dutch nurse experiences with fall prevention technology within nursing home environment and workflow: A qualitative study. Geriatr Nurs, 38(4), 276-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.11.005
�Nice job explaining the report but there shouldalso be an evaluaton of what was reported
�Examples of what was said?
�This paragraph is not clear
These questions should be answered
Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?
Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?
�Why is this true?
�How does nursing gain?
�The elderly are a vulnerable population with regard to research
�It would be good to have a summary of what was learned.
Were there any weaknesses to this study or limitations?
Were there suggestions for further research?
Overall nice work Adeduntan
Please review the comments and see if you can add this information as corrections for week 5