Ethical Dilemma BriefIntroductionHealth care administrators are confronted with ethical dilemmas and difficult decision making during their work. As we have already discovered, there are important int

Stuck with a difficult assignment? No time to get your paper done? Feeling confused? If you’re looking for reliable and timely help for assignments, you’ve come to the right place. We promise 100% original, plagiarism-free papers custom-written for you. Yes, we write every assignment from scratch and it’s solely custom-made for you.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Ethical Dilemma BriefIntroductionHealth care administrators are confronted with ethical dilemmas and difficult decision making during their work. As we have already discovered, there are important interactions between ethical behaviors and legal issues. Health care administrators need to understand the relationships as well as the distinct differences. Health care institutions have ethics committees that play a central role in the protection of patient’s rights, the organization as a whole, and its staff.InstructionsImagine you work as a professional health care administrator in a large medical center. You have been asked to present a paper at a professional conference on medical ethics and caregiver-patient encounters. You must write a paper about a significant physician-patient ethical dilemma in a medical setting, defending the decision and conclusions made.Below is a resource with multiple ethical case studies that involved patients, their families, and members of the interdisciplinary team. Choose one of the scenarios on this site, or select a case of your own choosing from another resource. Medical Ethics and Physician-Patient Encounters: Case Studies and Best Practices. Your paper should be 3–5 pages and should include a title page and references, for a total of 5–7 pages.Strayer Writing StandardsThis course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.Grading CriteriaThe grading criteria for this executive summary is as follows.It must include the elements listed below, so be sure to address each point. You may also want to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion in the scoring guide to see how your work will be assessed: Prepare a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Apply ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Outline the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Propose a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Defend the solution from an ethical standpoint. Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old. Provide appropriate in-text citations andreference section. Meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

Ethical Dilemma BriefIntroductionHealth care administrators are confronted with ethical dilemmas and difficult decision making during their work. As we have already discovered, there are important int
Name: w08a1 Description: w08a1 – Ethical Dilemma Brief Scoring Guide Grid View List View Unacceptable Needs Improvement Competent Exemplary Prepare a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not prepare a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Points: 11.025 (10.50%) Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Work is adequate but missing significant details. Points: 12.495 (11.90%) Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Points: 14.7 (14.00%) Prepares a brief from the perspective of a lead administrator dealing with an ethical dilemma. Work is authentic and fully supported by research. Apply ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not apply ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Points: 11.025 (10.50%) Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers, but work is superficial and lacks thoroughness. Points: 12.495 (11.90%) Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Points: 14.7 (14.00%) Applies ethical and moral theories to a case study involving a patient and caregivers. Work is scholarly and fully supported by relevant research and examples. Outline the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not outline the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 11.025 (10.50%) Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma, but work is missing key information or lacks substance. Points: 12.495 (11.90%) Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 14.7 (14.00%) Outlines the ethical concerns and potential outcomes in a selected ethical dilemma. Work is accurate and well- supported by credible evidence. Propose a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not propose a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 11.025 (10.50%) Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma, but recommendations are flawed or not clearly defined. Points: 12.495 (11.90%) Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Points: 14.7 (14.00%) Proposes a solution to mitigate the issues raised in a selected ethical dilemma. Recommendations are well thought out and fully support the solution. Defend the solution from an ethical standpoint. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not defend the solution from an ethical standpoint. Points: 11.025 (10.50%) Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint, but analysis lacks depth or overlooks key considerations. Points: 12.495 (11.90%) Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint. Points: 14.7 (14.00%) Defends the solution from an ethical standpoint and makes logically sound inferences based on current research. Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old. Points: 7.875 (7.50%) Use at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old, but references are dated or of poor quality. Points: 8.925 (8.50%) Uses at least three peer-reviewed articles less than five years old. Points: 10.5 (10.00%) Use at least three quality academic resources; references are high quality and references are error free. Provide appropriate in-text citations and reference section. Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not provide appropriate in-text citations and reference section. Points: 7.875 (7.50%) Provides in-text citations and reference section, but work is of poor quality or contains multiple errors. Points: 8.925 (8.50%) Provides appropriate in-text citations and reference section. Points: 10.5 (10.00%) Provides appropriate in-text citations and reference section; references are high quality and error free. New Row8 Points: 0 (0.00%) Meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Points: 7.875 (7.50%) Does not meet clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements. Points: 8.925 (8.50%) Partially meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 5–6 errors. Points: 10.5 (10.00%) Meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 3–4 errors. Meets clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements with 0–2 errors.

Writerbay.net

We’ve proficient writers who can handle both short and long papers, be they academic or non-academic papers, on topics ranging from soup to nuts (both literally and as the saying goes, if you know what we mean). We know how much you care about your grades and academic success. That's why we ensure the highest quality for your assignment. We're ready to help you even in the most critical situation. We're the perfect solution for all your writing needs.

Get a 15% discount on your order using the following coupon code SAVE15


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper