Criteria
PACO 500
Meaning-Making Forum Rubric (Based on 125 Point Total)
Criteria | Levels of Achievement | |||||
Criteria | Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence |
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :
Satisfies Criteria |
Developing (C- to C+):
Satisfies most criteria |
Below Expectations (F to D+):
Does not satisfy criteria |
Not Present | Points
Earned |
Content 70% (87.5 pts.) | ||||||
Thread
|
65-70 pts.
· All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread. · The thread has a clear, logical flow. All major points are stated clearly. · All major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings to date and good examples or thoughtful analysis.
|
59-64 pts.
· All key components of the Meaning-Making Forum prompt are answered in the thread. · The thread has a logical flow. Most major points are stated. · Most major points are supported by required evidence-based sources/readings to date and examples or analysis. |
53-58 pts.
· The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed. · The thread lacks flow and content. Major points are unclear or confusing. · Major points include minimal examples or analysis. |
1-52 pts.
· The Meaning-Making Forum prompt is addressed minimally or not at all. · The thread lacks content. Major points are unclear, confusing or not discussed at all. · Major points are not supported by examples or analysis.
|
0 points | |
Reply
|
16.5-17.5 pts.
· One Reply with Quote directly addresses a related thread. · The reply is a significant contribution supported by at least 1 required evidence-based source, thoughtful analysis of subject matter and thread. |
15.5 pts.
· One Reply with Quote directly addresses a related thread. · The reply is a contribution that reflects evidence-based thoughtful analysis of subject matter and thread. |
13.5-14.5 pts.
· One Reply with Quote addresses a related thread. · The reply lacks flow and content. Reply is unclear or confusing. |
1-12.5 pts.
· One Reply with Quote marginally addresses a related thread. · The reply lacks relevancy or clarity. |
0 points |
|
Structure 30% (37.5 pts.) | ||||||
Organization / Style/Sources
|
23-25 pts.
· The thread is presented with appropriate headings in bold, annotated outline with concise sentences, and organizational clarity. · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded. · The reply contains a salutation and meets or exceeds 150 word count. · Required sources/readings to date are noticeably present with appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references with format errors. |
21-22 pts.
· The thread is presented with most headings in bold, annotated outline with sentences, but slightly lacking organizational clarity. · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded. · The reply contains a salutation and meets or exceeds 150 word count. · Required sources/readings to date are noticeably present with appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references with minimal format errors. |
19-20 pts.
· The thread is presented with partial headings, without annotated outline and/or clear sentences, and/or lacks organizational clarity. · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is met or exceeded. · The reply does not contain a salutation and/or meet 150 word count. · Most required sources/readings to date are present yet reflect several APA or Turabian citations/references errors. |
1-18 pts.
· The thread is presented without headings and/or clear sentences, and lacks organizational clarity. · Thread’s minimum word count of 450 words is not met or exceeded. · The reply does not contain a salutation and meet 150 word count. · Three or more required sources to date are not present; Sources present lack appropriate APA or Turabian citations/references. |
0 points | |
Grammar/ Spelling
|
11.5-12.5 pts.
· Spelling, grammar are correct. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
9.5-10.5 pts.
· Sentences are reasonably complete, clear, and concise. Minor issues with proofreading/editing are noted. · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
8.5 pts.
· Sentences are less complete, clear, and concise. More pervasive / significant issues with proofreading / editing are noted. · Paragraphs contain appropriately varied sentence structures.
|
1-7.5 pts.
· Writing is not at the graduate level. It was clear that the work had not been edited or proofread. Multiple issues are noted. · Run-on paragraphs are observed. Sentence structure is not varied.
|
0 points | |
Total | / 125 |
Page 2 of 2