Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal 

ASSIGNMENT 2 Community Teaching Plan: Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal 

  1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% 2 Less than Satisfactory 75.00% 3 Satisfactory 83.00% 4 Good 94.00% 5 Excellent 100.00%
80.0 %Content  
30.0 %Identification of Focus for Community Teaching Focus of community teaching is not identified or is incomplete. Focus of community teaching is unclear or inconsistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings. Focus of community teaching is clear, but rationale for selection is not included. Focus of community teaching is clear, with a detailed explanation of rationale for selection. Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings, and supported by explanation of rationale.  
50.0 %Detailed and Comprehensive Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal Community teaching proposal is omitted or incomplete. Community teaching proposal is unclear or inconsistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings, demographic, or the scope of community-based resources. Community teaching proposal is clear with a complete summary of each area listed in the assignment criteria. Community teaching proposal is clearly described and is well supported by evidence from current literature and statistical/demographic data published on the community. There is a detailed summary of all required areas of the work plan. Community teaching proposal is detailed and comprehensive, with supportive evidence and a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers. Evidence from current literature and statistical/demographic data published on the community thoroughly supports the proposal in all required areas of the work plan.  
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
10.0 %Organization of Proposal, Paragraph Development and Transitions Organization of proposal is disjointed. Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. There are no apparent connections between ideas. Transitions are inappropriate or lacking. Some degree of organization is evident. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Proposal is well-organized and logical. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.  
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.  
5.0 %Format  
2.0 %Proposal template is applied correctly. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.  
3.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.  
100 %Total Weightage

"Is this question part of your assignment? We can help"

ORDER NOW